Meme or and um.
Just a little stepping back on the previous post of mine. First: it is always in the words that you find what you Google. Second: then they must still be filtered.
[ 8-20-07 * * * SEE PREVIOUS WARNING: CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK! * * * Wake Up America * * * ] caught my interest, and hit some spots that were familiar and where I often go.
The particular page on Rove and Hillary along with the new filter as I note above, Meme or and um , spells it all out. But I still have a ways to go, and it is not that clear where it is coming from. All I can say is that it is a filter. What it fertilizes is still up to the "hard work" of the people. Which is something I need to get back to... later.
[Heck: Oh and I did not even read the reference to language [8-20-07 * * * CLICK AT OWN RISK (in comments to Wake Up America) * * * ]
and ended mine on vocabulary,
but "there I go again". [[11:08 AM Re: Bill Clinton as a cuss word versus Cheney a pardon for such, is just a hint at a difference in perspectives, which I had missed earlier. "Pardon my Cheney" as in "Pardon my French."]]
Here I will preemptively hit the nail on the head.
Mother Jones, you see hints at the point in the title. Alleged White House-Petraeus Arm Wrestling Over September Report a Ruse? At least that is my point. And TYT. From other source or my general filtering, Patraeus is dancing around "the turd blossoms" of information and politics. Now I will read the report.-
Now that I have, it comports with my opinion and the facts. One thing that must be remembered, there is no obligation to tell the truth to anyone in the media. Even the media has the right to lie. And apparently in this case there may be two stories ** both in public and behind closed doors. And this goes directly back to troop involvement with the facts and whether their opinions matter, whether they are in or out of the military.]
[10:37 AM - My initial impression needs to be filtered, as now I see that Wake Up America has a perspective that still needs more sorting...]
** This is already being denied.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Pardon my. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Pardon my. Sort by date Show all posts
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Borrowed Comment!
* * *
[CAUTION NOTED 8-20-07: The first link below (Wake Up America) appears to cause my internet connection to experience difficulties when visiting it. So proceed to that link at your own risk! This is not a self-serving literary ploy. ]
* * * [The orginal post will not be touched,
See comments for anything more. 8-20-07]
* * *
* * * Wake Up America! CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK! * * *
Coming across this blogger, by doing a Google on Military Support Bush or Military Poll to find that Karl Rove is right, there are no links to (at least easily found) showing lack of military support for Bush. * But I did not find Rove's outlandish quote that "the troops get what they want and need". It seems that justifies what the administration says if they have the same sources and carefully navigate the intelligence.
On the other hand, I found some preemptive comments that may have played a role or seen the Rove role change coming or cause it. The latter first: Take it to Karl The former earlier: Karen Hughes: Karl Rove’s Kryptonite Oops, two years too early. Seen what coming or caused?
Bush should have been awoken much earlier, and we tried. Seriously, the guest comment, not that she is aware of my blog, hit a few points, Rove, the trooops/ Iraq, and Hillary with a few good links that I have yet to read, and will save comment for later. Suffice to say that it takes some filtering of the filter and there is more than fertilizer in them there hills, or links.
Oh heck I will touch on a few: Rove is a heck of a filter of fertilizer and the media as well. His comments on the troops, and his comment on Hillary, navigate though or pile on the fertilizer to some reality. And on "the surge", another cautious step through the piles of it.
* [posted and paused to continue: granted a little more search will find more, and in fact with my sources and rambling will probably stumble on me, but the point that I was going to make before I did undue diligence and tried to find some facts, is that polling the military may give a biased result based on two aspects, the filtering of their information and their freedom. Heck, I just threw in the Google as it was really a hit.
Pardon my vocabulary, but no more from the administration. Enough!
[11:19 AM my initial intrigue with the top link was due to my own spin on Rove, Hillary and Iraq/Troop intelligence, which I wove into my commentary but which may require more "hard work" either by the viewer or as my own reviewer. * * * CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK ! hehe * * * (now that is a hint)]]
[CAUTION NOTED 8-20-07: The first link below (Wake Up America) appears to cause my internet connection to experience difficulties when visiting it. So proceed to that link at your own risk! This is not a self-serving literary ploy. ]
* * * [The orginal post will not be touched,
See comments for anything more. 8-20-07]
* * *
* * * Wake Up America! CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK! * * *
Coming across this blogger, by doing a Google on Military Support Bush or Military Poll to find that Karl Rove is right, there are no links to (at least easily found) showing lack of military support for Bush. * But I did not find Rove's outlandish quote that "the troops get what they want and need". It seems that justifies what the administration says if they have the same sources and carefully navigate the intelligence.
On the other hand, I found some preemptive comments that may have played a role or seen the Rove role change coming or cause it. The latter first: Take it to Karl The former earlier: Karen Hughes: Karl Rove’s Kryptonite Oops, two years too early. Seen what coming or caused?
Bush should have been awoken much earlier, and we tried. Seriously, the guest comment, not that she is aware of my blog, hit a few points, Rove, the trooops/ Iraq, and Hillary with a few good links that I have yet to read, and will save comment for later. Suffice to say that it takes some filtering of the filter and there is more than fertilizer in them there hills, or links.
Oh heck I will touch on a few: Rove is a heck of a filter of fertilizer and the media as well. His comments on the troops, and his comment on Hillary, navigate though or pile on the fertilizer to some reality. And on "the surge", another cautious step through the piles of it.
* [posted and paused to continue: granted a little more search will find more, and in fact with my sources and rambling will probably stumble on me, but the point that I was going to make before I did undue diligence and tried to find some facts, is that polling the military may give a biased result based on two aspects, the filtering of their information and their freedom. Heck, I just threw in the Google as it was really a hit.
Pardon my vocabulary, but no more from the administration. Enough!
[11:19 AM my initial intrigue with the top link was due to my own spin on Rove, Hillary and Iraq/Troop intelligence, which I wove into my commentary but which may require more "hard work" either by the viewer or as my own reviewer. * * * CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK ! hehe * * * (now that is a hint)]]
Wednesday, September 01, 2004
They started it.
See same link... I say they started it. Two realities? Rumsfeld himself said facts change as noted here before I started providing links. You can check the archives around the time you think he may have said that. Reason enough for flip-flop. But a second reason as Cheney hit it, is mutual, sort of. Since they don't do nuance everything they can't understand has flip-flop potential. They do do French as in "pardon my French" as Cheney has been caught on a podium and the senate floor referring to a journalist and later a Senator.
Well if nuance is French, then pardon my Cheney. You would think that English is Greek to them but I won't go there. No I am not being vulgar just over my head academically.
Well if nuance is French, then pardon my Cheney. You would think that English is Greek to them but I won't go there. No I am not being vulgar just over my head academically.
Sunday, July 08, 2012
Who Let the Dogs Out?
Original reaction: Not to Second Guess.
This idea coalesced from a Melissa Harris-Perry(*) panel and a Jared Bernstein reaction.
What irritated me was the piling on upon Mitt Romney. The second guessing was how Jared Bernstein discusses the context he was taken out of. As the panel on MH-P continued after her weigh-in on words via Barack Obama the segment on Word Police had nothing to do with my change, but everything to do with it; change and context and victim hoods. Not to mention "quote(s) from Nerdlandia" creeping into the X-change. (The hazzards of live blogging.***) I had no clue in the "footnote" controversy.** Am I falling for the spin, that Raw Money is a victim? Or do I forget my own theory of Share 'n Angle? Not too mention differences of intents[!]
* to be updated
** to be related later[!]
*** the alternative would be more awkward[!]
7-9-12 A Hunch Revisited as Obama prepares* to speak on extending part of Bush tax cuts.
[Segue/break: the "Dogs" above are "aTax dogs"; my subtle skirt of the issue.]
Regarding the president's speech, here are my rough notes: Jobs.. core mission... rebuilding economy...stalemate...choice two views. Top down- wrong...typical middle class tax cuts $3600... repeat $3600 Obama midle class tax cuts... for sake of misinformation. We tried, slowest job growth, falling income, rising deficits... we can't afford more. [me: we 1/2 tried more or other way]. People are with him, cut small business taxes 18 times, for 97% of them. We should agree to do what we agree on! [poor 1%, 2% 3%] One year extention for under $250K then we can debate the rest and act or wait till after the election. You are the ones driving the economy. Learn lessons of the past, build foundation for the future.
* speech here[Note that links for "A Hunch Revisited" were contemporary, not later insertions. Referencing democracy and choices of direction.]
[Andrea Mitchell follow-up here: "fiscal cliff"?** and tug of misinfo! Deficit distraction or key?]
[Bingo was his dog! NewsNation "big tent" not to mention simple math from idiots. I'm sorry, but math is where the numbers lie. It is math warfare. But I digress. Well,* not exactly ! ** And pardon my pun but Swiss Romney Knife?]
** bit of a cycle/anachronism here*** regarding insertion of links & today's asterisks.(I may not have the right fiscal cliff clip but neither does the math add up for AM or RNC. Re:Bingo and math of the dog carrier or station waggin')
*** (rather here **) HW B? (SK re/v SE: 5:25 HW Harvy Weinstein)
[OW to Act?]
[Bingo too point OH! (see poor 1%, 2%, 3%: LR RL)]
(Anachronistically where does MB fit in here ? i.e. I can' remember where Luke Russert was nailed down. But I think it was Martin Bashir who was asking about the 1, 2 or 3% and the previous sequence w/links does hit the nail on the understanding or aTAX jobs.)
[Hardball: David Corn to Smerconish "Sin of making sense". Then Bob's your uncle. It certainly rots at the head. MM Marshalling Message ?]
This idea coalesced from a Melissa Harris-Perry(*) panel and a Jared Bernstein reaction.
What irritated me was the piling on upon Mitt Romney. The second guessing was how Jared Bernstein discusses the context he was taken out of. As the panel on MH-P continued after her weigh-in on words via Barack Obama the segment on Word Police had nothing to do with my change, but everything to do with it; change and context and victim hoods. Not to mention "quote(s) from Nerdlandia" creeping into the X-change. (The hazzards of live blogging.***) I had no clue in the "footnote" controversy.** Am I falling for the spin, that Raw Money is a victim? Or do I forget my own theory of Share 'n Angle? Not too mention differences of intents[!]
* to be updated
** to be related later[!]
*** the alternative would be more awkward[!]
7-9-12 A Hunch Revisited as Obama prepares* to speak on extending part of Bush tax cuts.
[Segue/break: the "Dogs" above are "aTax dogs"; my subtle skirt of the issue.]
Regarding the president's speech, here are my rough notes: Jobs.. core mission... rebuilding economy...stalemate...choice two views. Top down- wrong...typical middle class tax cuts $3600... repeat $3600 Obama midle class tax cuts... for sake of misinformation. We tried, slowest job growth, falling income, rising deficits... we can't afford more. [me: we 1/2 tried more or other way]. People are with him, cut small business taxes 18 times, for 97% of them. We should agree to do what we agree on! [poor 1%, 2% 3%] One year extention for under $250K then we can debate the rest and act or wait till after the election. You are the ones driving the economy. Learn lessons of the past, build foundation for the future.
* speech here[Note that links for "A Hunch Revisited" were contemporary, not later insertions. Referencing democracy and choices of direction.]
[Andrea Mitchell follow-up here: "fiscal cliff"?** and tug of misinfo! Deficit distraction or key?]
[Bingo was his dog! NewsNation "big tent" not to mention simple math from idiots. I'm sorry, but math is where the numbers lie. It is math warfare. But I digress. Well,* not exactly ! ** And pardon my pun but Swiss Romney Knife?]
** bit of a cycle/anachronism here*** regarding insertion of links & today's asterisks.(I may not have the right fiscal cliff clip but neither does the math add up for AM or RNC. Re:Bingo and math of the dog carrier or station waggin')
*** (rather here **) HW B? (SK re/v SE: 5:25 HW Harvy Weinstein)
[OW to Act?]
[Bingo too point OH! (see poor 1%, 2%, 3%: LR RL)]
(Anachronistically where does MB fit in here ? i.e. I can' remember where Luke Russert was nailed down. But I think it was Martin Bashir who was asking about the 1, 2 or 3% and the previous sequence w/links does hit the nail on the understanding or aTAX jobs.)
[Hardball: David Corn to Smerconish "Sin of making sense". Then Bob's your uncle. It certainly rots at the head. MM Marshalling Message ?]
Sunday, June 23, 2024
Tetrahedral log: Page One
Page One https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/09/this-will-start-with-backlog-of.html
Stumbled upon*: My response to Terrence Howard.
By Neil deGrasse Tyson
https://youtu.be/1uLi1I3G2N4?si=FCWNGUTmmB6fkEoY
Pardon my neglect in maintaining my skills in blog construction. Hopefully it is needless to say that I agree with Neil deGrasse Tyson and appreciate his perspective, intelligence and patience in addressing the piece submitted to him. I would certainly be happy if I had such input. Not that I have made any clear claims that may be disputed or tested. **
https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/10/tetrahedron-ramble.html
Post under construction:
Tetrahedron Model
https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Tetrahedron
Bingo! I must credit a partial reading of The Republic, by Plato and my report on it which involved a tetrahedral pillar. This is my theory of everything ...of sorts.
https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/07/ie-se-vi-edgy.html
* used before finding out a site by that name existed
** I use a semi-conscious and semi-scientific method[!]
[!] : indicates or punctuates play of words or intended pun.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
au contraire
Pardon my Cheney...(name calling and deleteds aside) it is not the "loonies" but the dis-enthused and profits of train wrecks* who may cost the Democrats.
[Post post con tent, i.e just in from my Inbox]
BTW: Cheney does not deserve a pardon, but my French does not need one.
* Barbara Walter's term for what sells or gets covered
[Post post con tent, i.e just in from my Inbox]
BTW: Cheney does not deserve a pardon, but my French does not need one.
* Barbara Walter's term for what sells or gets covered
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Apples and Oranges?
National Hyperbole?
Herman Cain is trying to explain his 9-9-9 or Sim City tax code, while Perry(or Romney) is trying to make the point that people don't want another tax, without pointing out the regressive nature of it. It really is apples and oranges, both of which will impact the 99% more than the 1%.
(tough segue)
(all+politics.)
[Cherry Picking the L word?]
[Local? Laffer? the Curve? Liberal?]
[My original intent was to note the rhetoric* in the hyperbole link, and get to my compromise-D point via "apples and oranges". i.e. who am I to recommend a Republican candidate? But suggesting that it go all the way, to the convention. Which itself is un-conventional, but do I have the facts to back that up? However...after last nights debate and a Rovian theory I have been scrolling over in my mind, could it be? Romney/Perry 2012?** In my opinion the best thing for the country is a more moderate Republican that will still be too right, that would allow Obama to hold the 99'ers. But that is not the way Republicans work, and it is even difficult sometimes for democracy to work. It is fine to attack an opponents strengths in a game or a battle and that works in politics, but that is not what works in governing.]
[Lions, and Tigers and Bears(please excuse the Wizard of OWS* analogy) is an apples and oranges and cherry picking procedure. For Republicans it is Tea or Koch and Rove, for democracy it is apples and oranges and cherry pitting. Pitting is a good thing, with apologies to Martha Stewart, not to mention George Washington, with his supposed hatchet.]
* not to disassemble in either sense, it is a great not so calm-pendium. Note that I did say "tough segue". And CAUTION please note that I do not always review the complete links that I insert, in particular the code of Rachel Maddow. And I cannot be responsible for links expiring or changing.
** Note that a more "realistic" combo(pardon the pun) may be Romney/Cain. And no pardon for the quotation marks, but the ticket would be more debate worthy. [OK, I pun on the pardon, but not the debate, with CAUTION.]
Herman Cain is trying to explain his 9-9-9 or Sim City tax code, while Perry(or Romney) is trying to make the point that people don't want another tax, without pointing out the regressive nature of it. It really is apples and oranges, both of which will impact the 99% more than the 1%.
(tough segue)
(all+politics.)
[Cherry Picking the L word?]
[Local? Laffer? the Curve? Liberal?]
[My original intent was to note the rhetoric* in the hyperbole link, and get to my compromise-D point via "apples and oranges". i.e. who am I to recommend a Republican candidate? But suggesting that it go all the way, to the convention. Which itself is un-conventional, but do I have the facts to back that up? However...after last nights debate and a Rovian theory I have been scrolling over in my mind, could it be? Romney/Perry 2012?** In my opinion the best thing for the country is a more moderate Republican that will still be too right, that would allow Obama to hold the 99'ers. But that is not the way Republicans work, and it is even difficult sometimes for democracy to work. It is fine to attack an opponents strengths in a game or a battle and that works in politics, but that is not what works in governing.]
[Lions, and Tigers and Bears(please excuse the Wizard of OWS* analogy) is an apples and oranges and cherry picking procedure. For Republicans it is Tea or Koch and Rove, for democracy it is apples and oranges and cherry pitting. Pitting is a good thing, with apologies to Martha Stewart, not to mention George Washington, with his supposed hatchet.]
* not to disassemble in either sense, it is a great not so calm-pendium. Note that I did say "tough segue". And CAUTION please note that I do not always review the complete links that I insert, in particular the code of Rachel Maddow. And I cannot be responsible for links expiring or changing.
** Note that a more "realistic" combo(pardon the pun) may be Romney/Cain. And no pardon for the quotation marks, but the ticket would be more debate worthy. [OK, I pun on the pardon, but not the debate, with CAUTION.]
Thursday, August 09, 2012
Cut the Cow Pie!
"Open source intelligence" or We Gee Bored?
Or grow the pie?
SEGUE:
Not to pun on CP or PC, but Craven Politics?
I think we found the opposite of PC, or pie cutter.
That's a more eh?
My original intent was to pun or posit the opposite of PC.
Politial Correctness, the Whine of Progress.
But it*** may be parsed* as Craven -v- Politics.
* Romney / Obama
[Foot note or b**PS ?]
**(ad?s) wonting to avoid gee/PS.
*** that posit
[Pardon my dimentional(and anachronistic) asterisks and acronyms, but B**ingo.]
[Note under ac"ron"yms is an anachronism. i.e. late link re: callus political calculus ]
[speaking of anachronism: just turning on Thom Hartmann with Mike Papantonio with caller on justice appointments question of obstruction and my pinnacle of politics]
[Note (2.0) The triangles are not the pie(or pi cutter), they are two dimensional, i.e. a tetrahedron. Speaking of spell check. ]
NOTE: Charts of Sorts.
Or grow the pie?
SEGUE:
Not to pun on CP or PC, but Craven Politics?
I think we found the opposite of PC, or pie cutter.
That's a more eh?
My original intent was to pun or posit the opposite of PC.
Politial Correctness, the Whine of Progress.
But it*** may be parsed* as Craven -v- Politics.
* Romney / Obama
[Foot note or b**PS ?]
**(ad?s) wonting to avoid gee/PS.
*** that posit
[Pardon my dimentional(and anachronistic) asterisks and acronyms, but B**ingo.]
[Note under ac"ron"yms is an anachronism. i.e. late link re: callus political calculus ]
[speaking of anachronism: just turning on Thom Hartmann with Mike Papantonio with caller on justice appointments question of obstruction and my pinnacle of politics]
[Note (2.0) The triangles are not the pie(or pi cutter), they are two dimensional, i.e. a tetrahedron. Speaking of spell check. ]
NOTE: Charts of Sorts.
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
CONnecting the . . .
Dots.
Preemptive Comments:
My earliest recollection is that I borrowed it (connecting the dots reference to 9-11 failures/blame) from a news anchor since it hit the nail on the head(or at least in my mind). Since then I have been all over the map and found that others have similar maps. Those being on the track of "which came first" or who borrowed what or who was filtering whom, or leaking officially the "frame". Actually the implication is that there is a logical connection, or any connection, most of all direct. That is the least of it. In reality the connection is what is intended despite the dots otherwise know as intelligence "data", the path or what it takes.
Preemptive Links/Leaks:
Food Chain of Command
The road to intentions are paved with unread or misread links akin to the nuance of diplomacy or war by only means.
[Pardon my wordplay but not the administrations results.]
Further footnote: I have not fully read any of these links therefore the caution or pre-mea culpa, but please click bottom main link in con(text)nection to SeeMore Scary of the Rice Course in reading memos and playing/dealing hands.
Final Connection/Comment(Historical Reference):
George Washington may not have lied about chopping down a cherry tree, but Un-Curious George is still cherry-picking while swinging from one broken limb to another, about to be buried in his own Bushel.
Preemptive Comments:
My earliest recollection is that I borrowed it (connecting the dots reference to 9-11 failures/blame) from a news anchor since it hit the nail on the head(or at least in my mind). Since then I have been all over the map and found that others have similar maps. Those being on the track of "which came first" or who borrowed what or who was filtering whom, or leaking officially the "frame". Actually the implication is that there is a logical connection, or any connection, most of all direct. That is the least of it. In reality the connection is what is intended despite the dots otherwise know as intelligence "data", the path or what it takes.
Preemptive Links/Leaks:
Food Chain of Command
The road to intentions are paved with unread or misread links akin to the nuance of diplomacy or war by only means.
[Pardon my wordplay but not the administrations results.]
Further footnote: I have not fully read any of these links therefore the caution or pre-mea culpa, but please click bottom main link in con(text)nection to SeeMore Scary of the Rice Course in reading memos and playing/dealing hands.
Final Connection/Comment(Historical Reference):
George Washington may not have lied about chopping down a cherry tree, but Un-Curious George is still cherry-picking while swinging from one broken limb to another, about to be buried in his own Bushel.
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
Right and Wrong Preemptive Pardon.
The heading above reflects a very large field for this administration but my point refers to my post Impeachable and Imprisonable.
I was correctly preemptive in my claim that "the administration could not follow old ones" a day before the court ruling. It is fully represented in my letter to a local paper. Politics of Terror: Democrats, don't fear national security issue
I was erroneous in reflecting the idea of "impeachment being the limits of what a president may suffer." Removal from office is the most one can suffer from impeachment. But other legal ramifications and remedies may be possible. Another concern mixed into this confusion is that impeachment is unpardonable, and that convictions are needed before pardons are obtained.
In much earlier conversations(not necessarily blogged) I also claimed that Bush is lucky that impeachment is the worst he could get, but of course that is another one of my rare errors. I have also made reference more than once, maybe not in blog, that I would welcome being wrong, and we would be lucky if I were more wrong.
I was correctly preemptive in my claim that "the administration could not follow old ones" a day before the court ruling. It is fully represented in my letter to a local paper. Politics of Terror: Democrats, don't fear national security issue
I was erroneous in reflecting the idea of "impeachment being the limits of what a president may suffer." Removal from office is the most one can suffer from impeachment. But other legal ramifications and remedies may be possible. Another concern mixed into this confusion is that impeachment is unpardonable, and that convictions are needed before pardons are obtained.
In much earlier conversations(not necessarily blogged) I also claimed that Bush is lucky that impeachment is the worst he could get, but of course that is another one of my rare errors. I have also made reference more than once, maybe not in blog, that I would welcome being wrong, and we would be lucky if I were more wrong.
Tuesday, April 26, 2016
Bio ~ engineering.
My first major was Chemical Engineering at USC before a stint in their East Asian Languages and Cultures Department.* After a sabbatical for a number of years, the result was a BA in Liberal Studies at the University of Washington.
[anachronistic writing]**
*removing the impression that I am at all responsible for the hyperlink
** the following are notes in progress akin to side notes on a page being read
NOTES:
Madhyamaka / Dialetheist crazy ~ unmattaka
M-theory of D {?}
Paraconsistent Logic
Paradox ~ ironic ~ rhetorical device
Conceptualization ~/~ falsifies
Nietzsche: tT~ER (eternal recurrence)
Radical Contextualist Semantics ~requires meaning
Statement ~\~ truthmaker (not required)
===================== segue ==========
W-Theory ~ Milo Wolff
Logical Positivism Fusion v. Confluence
Defluence is the struggle[!]
===================== theory?==========
LEVEL TWO NOTES:
W for Wolff AND Wave
Not to mention paradox of M.
Model / Madhyamaka / meaning?
D for Dialetheist, Dimensions and Design
Even rougher notes:
Paraconsistent Wittgenstein
Popper's poker.
=============
Then there is Methane[!]
Big T, and small t: Truth and Tetrahedron
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* asterisk info only added 5-2-16
Pardon my style.
[anachronistic writing]**
*removing the impression that I am at all responsible for the hyperlink
** the following are notes in progress akin to side notes on a page being read
NOTES:
Madhyamaka / Dialetheist crazy ~ unmattaka
M-theory of D {?}
Paraconsistent Logic
Paradox ~ ironic ~ rhetorical device
Conceptualization ~/~ falsifies
Nietzsche: tT~ER (eternal recurrence)
Radical Contextualist Semantics ~requires meaning
Statement ~\~ truthmaker (not required)
===================== segue ==========
W-Theory ~ Milo Wolff
Logical Positivism Fusion v. Confluence
Defluence is the struggle[!]
===================== theory?==========
LEVEL TWO NOTES:
W for Wolff AND Wave
Not to mention paradox of M.
Model / Madhyamaka / meaning?
D for Dialetheist, Dimensions and Design
Even rougher notes:
Paraconsistent Wittgenstein
Popper's poker.
=============
Then there is Methane[!]
Big T, and small t: Truth and Tetrahedron
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* asterisk info only added 5-2-16
Pardon my style.
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
The General Theory of Karl Rove
And The Relative Specialty* of President Obama!
A. The General Theory: Attack what works!
B. The Theory of Special Relativity: Congress makes the laws!
The General Theory of Karl Rove: *Attack what works*. The Theory of Special Relativity of Obama. "Congress makes the laws, and he can't rein(or reign o'r) cats or dogs.* (partial translation: laws are a product of committee think) It is not surprising that it is difficulty reading and two courts can read it different.
...
And congress can Bane or...
---
Focus/Highlight: 2nd Video w/ Chris Hayes
BTW: don't count on my physics but who knows?
*[Rough draft in progress.]
Q ED
6th edgy?
7-30-14
PARDON MY SPACIOUSNESS: WINDOWS/EXPLORER COMPATABILITY ANOMALY
Maslow's[?] woah.
A. The General Theory: Attack what works!
B. The Theory of Special Relativity: Congress makes the laws!
The General Theory of Karl Rove: *Attack what works*. The Theory of Special Relativity of Obama. "Congress makes the laws, and he can't rein(or reign o'r) cats or dogs.* (partial translation: laws are a product of committee think) It is not surprising that it is difficulty reading and two courts can read it different.
...
And congress can Bane or...
---
Focus/Highlight: 2nd Video w/ Chris Hayes
BTW: don't count on my physics but who knows?
*[Rough draft in progress.]
Q ED
6th edgy?
7-30-14
PARDON MY SPACIOUSNESS: WINDOWS/EXPLORER COMPATABILITY ANOMALY
Maslow's[?] woah.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Pardon My Cheney[!]
Are they* going Dutch?
My inference is in the pan, not the beef.
Who pays for the good of the order?
*1. First Thoughts: State Dinner Serves Apologetic Undertones
2. Reaganomics and Joe the Plumber
3.Change in the Age of Schism[!], 4., 5., 6. Bully Pulpit Not for Pitbulls
4(a/k) .(b.Pre-Pan FRY., c. Coin-age of the day. d., e., f., g.Public Intelligence, h.Tea Kettle Sports[!], i. , j.Tetrahedron Files, k. OW )
5.(a-e) a. Fiscal Charting, c.Fear and Running, d.Recent Letters., e. BINGO!
Tuesday, September 07, 2010
Work is a four letter word.
Thank God for profits.
Herd this Mourning.
Note, spelling is intentional, and pardon my sarcasm or speaking in vein. Technically I have knot.
OK, back on track. Thanks to Stephanie Miller's replacement mooks or rather the callers.
A. recalling the Eisenhower tax rates regarding prosperity
B. (hold that thought)[*]
C. poll is a four letter word, darn, so is word.
B2.0 the thought...maybe that the argument that the debt is bad, can be addressed by slight adjustments in taxes, if tax breaks have been proven to not be sustainable and increase debt more than jobs...
See C? Politico is right! But is TPM left or wrong?
Speaking of the word, dove or hawk?
P.S. just because something works, does not mean it is good or bad, but you do the math. Speaking of Clean Ex! [Oh & the herd link was my last crack.]
[*] it may have been a different thought but much of this did not exactly flow directly. But basically, debt is bad, yet you can't make a four letter word** out of taxes. And war did not exactly get us out of anything, without paying for it.
**The word is anecdotal as a tissue** of prosperity & tax rates.
*** nor g**gle
Herd this Mourning.
Note, spelling is intentional, and pardon my sarcasm or speaking in vein. Technically I have knot.
OK, back on track. Thanks to Stephanie Miller's replacement mooks or rather the callers.
A. recalling the Eisenhower tax rates regarding prosperity
B. (hold that thought)[*]
C. poll is a four letter word, darn, so is word.
B2.0 the thought...maybe that the argument that the debt is bad, can be addressed by slight adjustments in taxes, if tax breaks have been proven to not be sustainable and increase debt more than jobs...
See C? Politico is right! But is TPM left or wrong?
Speaking of the word, dove or hawk?
P.S. just because something works, does not mean it is good or bad, but you do the math. Speaking of Clean Ex! [Oh & the herd link was my last crack.]
[*] it may have been a different thought but much of this did not exactly flow directly. But basically, debt is bad, yet you can't make a four letter word** out of taxes. And war did not exactly get us out of anything, without paying for it.
**The word is anecdotal as a tissue** of prosperity & tax rates.
*** nor g**gle
Monday, July 09, 2012
Mitt's BO*Son
Not to get too physicsCal,
but the Mitt Flop of mass theory is Political.
Is it the Tetrahedron of Won't or Wont?
Share ’N Angle
Issa Coverup Committee
Cain TV
Rance Priebus
The Devo Incar-n8?
You do the math.
Or Revoo due the math !
Why is Raw Money a uniter not a divider, because they can't do the math.
[Ctrl F Intents Post B.S.]
* past particle pun
[7-10-12 Pardon my pun getting lost in the physics, boss.
Speaking of bookin'** or book ends.***]
** tan gent (or ge oh me try***)
*** not gun a go there
[but Kan'T : A Brief Incite?]
[I may have smoothed the edges of my pairaGone.]
[Speaking of NOW: DWS "Class Act" What about capital gains? People v. R-Money. (Share 'n Angle v. Robbin' Hood) Those poor 1,2,3%!]
[NTM: Jansing &Co.][CW: Caricature Writer @DWS.cc]
[P. S.]
but the Mitt Flop of mass theory is Political.
Is it the Tetrahedron of Won't or Wont?
Share ’N Angle
Issa Coverup Committee
Cain TV
Rance Priebus
The Devo Incar-n8?
You do the math.
Or Revoo due the math !
Why is Raw Money a uniter not a divider, because they can't do the math.
[Ctrl F Intents Post B.S.]
* past particle pun
[7-10-12 Pardon my pun getting lost in the physics, boss.
Speaking of bookin'** or book ends.***]
** tan gent (or ge oh me try***)
*** not gun a go there
[but Kan'T : A Brief Incite?]
[I may have smoothed the edges of my pairaGone.]
[Speaking of NOW: DWS "Class Act" What about capital gains? People v. R-Money. (Share 'n Angle v. Robbin' Hood) Those poor 1,2,3%!]
[NTM: Jansing &Co.][CW: Caricature Writer @DWS.cc]
[P. S.]
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Not to be full of it...
or demonstrate I Ron Knee...
but everything must be taken in context.
In fact, WMD is an example and Weapon of Mass Distraction, Akin to E.D (entitlement distraction).
Hume or ... is an example of empiricism, and empire is not so in context.
Pardon my tan gent, but not my French* or Cheney, let alone Rumsfeld.
*link inserted 3-28-14 and is technically an anti-thesis.
but everything must be taken in context.
In fact, WMD is an example and Weapon of Mass Distraction, Akin to E.D (entitlement distraction).
Hume or ... is an example of empiricism, and empire is not so in context.
Pardon my tan gent, but not my French* or Cheney, let alone Rumsfeld.
*link inserted 3-28-14 and is technically an anti-thesis.
Monday, December 01, 2014
Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One)
12-1-14 The
Un-Revolved(~) Thread: (bottom up-4) (C): Schiller,
Schelli.ng, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*? , Kobayashi
Maru, (c) What
are the Frackin' Odds..., (d) One
of my readers, (e) Speaking
of Timing, Canard
Lines, Catching
Up with US., Post-Pyth?
(V): (Vienna), Post-Pyth? (3) Ludwig Wittgenstein - Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus - Preface,
(2) "The Plausibility of Wittgenstein's Metaphilosophy" - Timothy Williamson & Paul Horwich, (1) Wittgenstein
http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/microsite/sports?cmpid=FCST_sportslist_nfl#NFL
12-4-14: ebb:War on Hillary[!], of:Hump Day?, war:WOW, (b.s.)... raven, (b.s.)[!] football NO! Jung on the Enantiodromia!
12-5-14: to Pun on the 5th scroll / over *scheduled post*=today. Above * = yesterday. i.e. 4 FP more than the ** issue or weak[!] ~week~. (FP2)*
12-8-14: post - posted
(FP 12-9-14)
12-10-14: a. , b. , C. Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em , D. Failure is always , e. Go Left Young Man!, F. Slippery Slope
12-15-14: on Saturday the 13th no post, but 15th update.
12-29-14 (of the): A. Para-model, b. The Billy Club..., c. Why OWS is bigger than Left vs. Right., d. The Curve or Nuance Thing, e. THANK YOU DAVE ROSS! , f. Turning the page (On Humor)? , g. Turning the Page (2.0) h. Bush the United , I. What the Beck? , j. No Teddy , k., (l.) Unity Hits Reality, (m.) Throwing the Game (note font size A. & I. = Normal Ctrl F "of the left")
** or muddle is the hume or...
( comparison) : A. The Billy Club..., B.Genre Clash, C.
(gravitas): A. 4Mat, B. Way, Too Point Oh?, C. Or ask for a third, D. Funneling Crisis?
ticket: A. Hump Day? , B. The New Compendium , C. Primary Boogeyman , D. Not to make light... , E. Monkey Business , F. The Hope'd4 Campaign , G. ( ), H. Not to Follow-Up... , I. The other ground game... , J. What Obama can't say. , K. Checking In: , L. Two Wrongs Make a Right? , M. Churned Media , N. Republicans can't run against congress anymore. , O. Co-Op-Ed , P. Where does this fit? , Q. On any given day? , R. Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? (...)
(V): (Vienna), Post-Pyth? (3) Ludwig Wittgenstein - Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus - Preface,
(2) "The Plausibility of Wittgenstein's Metaphilosophy" - Timothy Williamson & Paul Horwich, (1) Wittgenstein
http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/microsite/sports?cmpid=FCST_sportslist_nfl#NFL
12-2-14 War on Hillary[!] OW ! Monkey Business Hmmm. (FP2)
12-3-14 Maybe you had to be there(FP1). [Which is actually here, see anamoly @ (3) and below when scrolling this all.)] It is likely I accidently clicked on a function or blogspot instruction, that I am unaware of. Pardon my muchado about anomaly. The point was to review the day and reference the points, as color coded under ROY G BIV. As to more under Hillary I refer to the geometrics of the Third Way or monkey business of recent posts. I seem to have mucked ~~~~up~~~~ enough for now.
12-3-14 Maybe you had to be there(FP1). [Which is actually here, see anamoly @ (3) and below when scrolling this all.)] It is likely I accidently clicked on a function or blogspot instruction, that I am unaware of. Pardon my muchado about anomaly. The point was to review the day and reference the points, as color coded under ROY G BIV. As to more under Hillary I refer to the geometrics of the Third Way or monkey business of recent posts. I seem to have mucked ~~~~up~~~~ enough for now.
12-4-14: ebb:War on Hillary[!], of:Hump Day?, war:WOW, (b.s.)... raven, (b.s.)[!] football NO! Jung on the Enantiodromia!
12-5-14: to Pun on the 5th scroll / over *scheduled post*=today. Above * = yesterday. i.e. 4 FP more than the ** issue or weak[!] ~week~. (FP2)*
12-8-14: post - posted
(FP 12-9-14)
12-10-14: a. , b. , C. Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em , D. Failure is always , e. Go Left Young Man!, F. Slippery Slope
12-15-14: on Saturday the 13th no post, but 15th update.
12-29-14 (of the): A. Para-model, b. The Billy Club..., c. Why OWS is bigger than Left vs. Right., d. The Curve or Nuance Thing, e. THANK YOU DAVE ROSS! , f. Turning the page (On Humor)? , g. Turning the Page (2.0) h. Bush the United , I. What the Beck? , j. No Teddy , k., (l.) Unity Hits Reality, (m.) Throwing the Game (note font size A. & I. = Normal Ctrl F "of the left")
** or muddle is the hume or...
( comparison) : A. The Billy Club..., B.Genre Clash, C.
(gravitas): A. 4Mat, B. Way, Too Point Oh?, C. Or ask for a third, D. Funneling Crisis?
ticket: A. Hump Day? , B. The New Compendium , C. Primary Boogeyman , D. Not to make light... , E. Monkey Business , F. The Hope'd4 Campaign , G. ( ), H. Not to Follow-Up... , I. The other ground game... , J. What Obama can't say. , K. Checking In: , L. Two Wrongs Make a Right? , M. Churned Media , N. Republicans can't run against congress anymore. , O. Co-Op-Ed , P. Where does this fit? , Q. On any given day? , R. Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? (...)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)